Artstop:Ogden . . . from page 2
ARTSTOP:OGDEN exists solely on a month-to-month
contribution for office space. The proposal was to ‘dress-up’
the space which had been sitting empty for three years, to make
it more appealing to potential business-owners.
According to Macnofsky, “we refer to our ‘ephemeral’
presence here as the ‘Cinderella Syndrome’—we can turn back into
a pumpkin at any moment: as soon as someone shows up with the
capital resources to pay for the office space, we move on. .
.” But, Macnofsky is not complaining, “This embodies the
essential practice of Buddhist ‘non-attachment’ —when these spaces
lease, of course we’ll be sad to go. But it will demonstrate a
tangible ‘value’ of arts directly impacting economic development. There
are still other empty storefronts along Washington Blvd, waiting
for their chance to be Cinderella . . . to be dressed up and re-valued.”
Macnofsky likens the redevelopment currently underway in Ogden
to cosmetic surgery, “We are in that awkward period of post-op
following a facelift—we should be hiding in the house with the
shades drawn—but life and business demand that we carry on as usual.
Two years from now, with the mall renovation, the new IRS building,
the American Can redevelopment, 25th Street’s Union Square complex
and the RiverWalk project—Ogden is going to be radiant, and people
will be doing double & triple-takes on what’s changed in Weber
County. I believe the arts district will be one of the gems that show-off
Ogden’s renewed beauty and “allure.”
ARTSTOP:OGDEN is a division of Downtown Ogden, Inc.
located at 2484 Washington Blvd., Ste 101-102. For more information,
to apply for studio space or to enlist as a volunteer Arts Ambassador,
contact Robin Macnofsky at 393-3866.
Letter From the Editor --Artists of Utah
The Role
of Criticism
by Shawn Rossiter
A recent article by Raphael Rubinstein in the March isse of
Art in America entitled "A Quiet Crisis" caught my eye recently.
In the article, Rubinstein lamented the growing trend for criticism
to do everything but critique. "As a critic," he wrote "lately I've
begun to feel that something more than explaining and advocacy is called
for, that qualitative choices must be made -- and articulated."
He noted a recent report that stated that 75% of art critics surveyed
responded that "rendering a personal judgment is considered by art critics
to be the least important factor in reviewing art," while 91% felt their
main role was to "educate the public about visual art and why it matters."
The article made me consider our own position on why we publish
15 BYTES.
We certainly serve an educational purpose, to inform artists and
the public about the visual artists in their state. In addition, however,
we have always wanted to create a lively discussion about the visual arts
and visual artists and have always encouraged serious critiques of art
exhibitions.
In a recent edition of this ezine, we ran a review of a number
of shows in Salt Lake City. In the process of critiquing the shows,
the reviewer had both positive and negative comments about the artwork
and/or the presentation of the exhibitions.
Though at times the tone of the article may have been somewhat
glib, we felt that the presentation of the reveiwer's ideas were at
least coherent and well forumlated.
We did, however, receive negative feedback about the review, both
oral and written. One writer was nice enough to take exception to
some negative comments in the critique about my own work and wondered why
we had chosen to print the review when the purpose of Artists of Utah is
for artists to work together as a community.
As editors we have considered the role of criticism in our pages.
We feel that it is important to have an open forum to discuss, even if
it is to point out faults. We demand our reviewers write well and write
fairly but we do not demand that they write positively.
As to the role of criticism, we agree with Christopher Knight of
the LA Times that "Criticism is a considered argument about art, not
a priestly initiation of the unenlightened into a catechism of established
knowledge."
Our reviewers are freelance, unpaid writers and their opinions
are precisely that, opinions.
We are simply glad that they have opinions and we are heartened
to find individuals who care enough about the visual arts in our community
to take the time to write about them for our pages.
A critic is a necessary check and balance to the power structure
of any art world, no matter how small. As Rubenstein pointed out
in his article, critics have a freedom "commensurate with their lack of
power." Curators and gallery owners have the power to decide what to show,
and if they are professional about it they feel a sense of responsibility
commensurate with that power to be public servants. If, however, there
is no one to call into question the judgment of a curator or a gallery
director , or the artists they show, then there is no control for the
power that can be wielded.
We hope that our pages can be used to educate, but we also hope
that our pages can be a forum where an informed opinion about art, adequately
expressed, can be a catalyst for thought and discussion.
As always we invite comments about any of our articles and will
publish well-written letters to the editor in this space.
write to: artistsofutah@netzero.net