Go to 15 Bytes Home
page 6
Print This Page
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
Subscribe to 15 Bytes For Free
    July 2008
Page 5    
Near Sugarhouse, by J.T. Harwood, from the permanent collection of the A. Ray Olpin University Union at the University of Utah
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Alder's Accounts
J.T. Harwood: Father of Utah Art
by Tom Alder

Many consider James Tayor Harwood [1860-1940] to be the father of Utah art, so no mere column could hope to describe his life and contributions to our cultural history. It would be like sitting at the keyboard and writing a 1,500 word essay about George Washington. My first encounter with Harwood was in Dorval, Quebec in October, 1969. My first missionary assignment put me in a basement apartment where everything was cheap wood paneling, a radiator (that didn't work) and a loan picture of Harwood's "Come Follow Me." This highly-impressionistic work (the original is in the central gallery at the Museum of Church History and Art) glowed. I couldn't believe how someone could use such heavy brushstrokes to convey a message. To me, the message of the art was as strong as the spiritual significance. I can't look at the original any more without reminiscing about my cold, lonely Quebec days.

There are numerous eminent people who have demonstrated their depth of knowledge of Harwood including Bob Olpin, Vern Swanson, Will South, and James Haseltine. However, I chose to pick the brain of my very able and considerably-sharp gallery partner, Clayton Williams, who has decades of stories and details about Harwood.

For those of you who do not keep Artists of Utah at your side, here are a few background facts about Harwood before I share with you the Clayton anecdotes. Harwood, a native of Lehi, Utah, received early training from Dan Weggeland, and Alfred Lambourne, two household words in the realms of early Utah art. Excelling beyond his mentors' capabilities, Harwood was accepted at the California School of Design in 1884 after submitting what director Virgil Williams said was "the best piece of work ever done by an applicant." The young student's "Bunch of Grapes" (1884) set the tone for what would become a very accomplished career. Harwood returned to Utah in 1885 and set up shop as an art teacher in Salt Lake, where he counted among his students Herman Haag, one of the French Art Missionaries.

By 1886, Harwood sought what was then the ultimate training for up and coming visual artists -- Paris. He studied first at the Academie Julian [a favorite destination for many Utah artists to follow], under Laurens, Bonnat, Constant, and Doucet. Following a return to Salt Lake, Harwood again traveled to Paris where he met fellow Utah art student, Harriet Richards who would soon become his wife.

Harwood, the first Utah artist to study in Paris, adhered to the strict academic style taught in the Paris academies of the time, which allowed him to create such classical paintings as "Preparation for Dinner" (1892). Later, Harwood was also accepted into the prestigious state-sponsored Ecole des Beaux-Arts concurrently with the Julian, as he continued to understand and appreciate the necessity of developing a strong drawing technique. That same training would be required of his own students later during his extensive teaching career.

In 1888-1889, Harwood corresponded with John Hafen, still in Utah, suggesting that he could live in Paris for $1,000 per year and that he should come to seek the best art instruction available. Hafen wrote a letter to George Q. Cannon of the First Presidency of the LDS Church about sponsoring him and two colleagues (JB Fairbanks, and Lorus Pratt) to travel to Paris for further training in Paris (see our December 2007 edition).

Beginning in 1903, Harwood made frequent trips to Paris to refresh himself at the fountainhead of art instruction. He was undoubtedly exposed to the progressive art movements of the time like post-impressionism, Fauvism, and cubism. In 1911, in addition to teaching privately in Salt Lake, Harwood instructed secondary students at East and West High Schools.

According to Clayton Williams, Harwood moved his family to California in 1920, hoping to position himself to sell more art at higher prices, not an unusual practice for talented Utah artists then and now. The move proved to be short since Harwood's beloved "Hattie" passed away in 1922, due to complications from a goiter. For a more detailed, and tearful account of Harwood's depression as a result of his wife's death, see A Basket of Chips, Harwood's autobiography of sorts.

During this painful time in Harwood's life, the University of Utah was seeking a capable artist and art educator to head its art department. Harwood accepted the position and began a seven-year stint as the chair of the art department. During his tenure at the U, such legendary artists as Lee Greene Richards, Jack Sears, and Mabel Frazer would pass through the halls of the Department. It was Sears who said later that Harwood "...made us draw constantly, and only the best work from a student was accepted. We would spend a whole week preparing a drawing of a ball."

In 1929, Harwood took a sabbatical from his position at the U to marry again. His eye had caught the fancy of a young art student. Ione Godwin, 47 years his junior. Can you imagine the scandal of the time? A 70-year old department chair marrying a student young enough to be his granddaughter? The two were very much in love and two children were born to the couple, who resided on Lake Street in Salt Lake. Williams, who has lectured extensively on Harwood, remarked that the artist built a sort of lean-to in the back yard of his home where he and Ione would sleep out under the stars. It reminds me of what Bob Olpin once wrote on our research papers when my wife and I took his Utah Art Life class. "Linda: realist. Tom: romantic."

Williams also reported that all of Harwood's paintings after his marriage to Ione bore the initials "lae" on them in inconspicuous spaces. The three letters stand for French and English words ("sort of Frenchlish") that equate to "To loving or laughing eyes." I was trying to find evidence in Harwood's later paintings but quit after getting a headache. Williams said that they were Harwood's continuous signal to Ione of his love for her.

I asked Williams what he thought Harwood's greatest legacy was. "It is quite unusual to find an artist of the time who remained consistent in his painting, staying close to his several styles throughout his career. Harwood did that through his 80th year. He was truly the pioneer who recognized the value of academic study in Paris. He was the first of the Utah artists to go to Paris and set the bar for others to follow." Williams also remarked that Harwood "was gifted, industrious, that is he took his gift and made the most of it, and was very moral and normal. He was far more balanced than so many other artists."

Williams admires Harwood's work as a plein air painter, but pointed out that Harwood also used photographs as source material for his paintings, something that likely would have been frowned upon by his instructors at the Ecole and the Julian. In 1990, Williams held a symposium about photos that had emerged [purchased by someone from an antique store for $90] that offered proof that twenty or so of the 140 photos had turned into oil paintings. Most students of the study of Harwood will readily recognize "Blowing Soap Bubbles," an oil painting portrait of Harwood's daughter, Ruth, blowing bubbles. Ruth was about five years old when her father painted the memorable image. A photo from the purchased collection indicates that at least part of the portrait was made from the photo.|9| Similar photos exist that match "Footsteps in the Snow" at Liberty Park in Salt Lake (Springville Museum of Art). Another painting, "Adoration of the Ages," can be traced to several photos of Ruth holding onto the robes of a manikin, and also a photo of a blind man, taken in Paris. Transferring images to glass plates and then projecting them on canvas has been an effective technique that was advanced by, among others, Samuel F.B. Morse. Whether or not the technique was discouraged, Harwood capitalized on it and created some of the most beautiful and valuable art to ever be produced in Utah or Paris.

Harwood paintings can be viewed in many local schools (East, West, Highland, U of U) where he left his mark—er—brushstrokes. Stop in at the Union Ballroom next time you are on the campus and stare at the glorious and huge Harwood paintings that are elevated at the front of the room. Bring your binoculars for a good look.

Perhaps it was Leconte Stewart, a later successor to Harwood at the U, who offered one of the best descriptions of this "father of Utah art," when he remarked, "[Harwood] was an idealist who emphasized an essential drawing foundation and craftsmanship in the development of art students." Olpin further suggested that "that tradition was carried forward with emphasis at the U of U chairmanships of Alvin Gittins, Ed Maryon, Doug Snow, and hopefully again in the current period [referring to himself as the then current chair of the art and art history department]."

Monet to Picasso continued from page 1

This technique is also evident in "The Red Kerchief: Portrait of Mme. Monet" by Claude Monet (1868-78).|0| It's as if the light is reflected not only in the white brush strokes but is evidenced in the reflection of shadow in the darker foreground strokes. The technique of implementing both light and atmosphere is generously combined in one single element, which draws the viewer's eye to the subject. This element is translucency. The drapes are translucent, showing the yellow roof of a farm in the distance, causing the atmospheric effect ideal and necessary to the Impressionists. This translucency moves this from the indoor portrait to the idea of the exterior world as use in subject. "The Red Kerchief..." is most certainly a bridge between the earlier works of the Impressionist period and the later, more easily recognized pieces of the movement. Though both portraits are strikingly different, both break the rules of academic painting and are executed with a determined focus on light, brushstroke, everyday life and atmosphere inherent of the ideals of Impressionism.

The Post-Impressionists rejected Impressionism's emphasis on naturalism and instead emphasized the use of color and pattern in concert with light. This often younger group of artists concerned themselves with pictorial structure far more than their predecessors. They introduced a new dynamic way of seeing by form, line and color elaborated upon from the Impressionists' perhaps more placid, static forms.

"In the Waves" by Paul Gauguin combines techniques of the Impressionist period and employs elements of nature, but is altogether different from the style of his predecessors.|1| Instead of singularly using the movement of light as form, he uses the form of his subject as movement. In doing this he creates an obvious striking contrast between the soft lines of the figure and the bold white strokes of the torrential waves. Similarly to both "Romaine Lacaux" and "The Red Kerchief..." Gauguin uses strokes refracting white light in order to place emphasis on his subject. But, though he uses this technique, the effects are different because they emphasize the movement of the subject in contrast with the waves, instead of the dominance of the light as movement. This subtle shift, combined with his skillful use of bright color is a visual turning point from the Impressionists to the Post-Impressionist ideas of pictorial structure.

Another piece, which successfully shows the post-impressionist use of color, is "The Brook" by Cezanne.|2| He has taken a common subject of light and nature from the Impressionists and executed this subject with bright, contrasting and complementing color for the effect of atmosphere. He has gone a step further than this by breaking up elements in the painting with not only color but direction of brush stroke. He has created separate forms of each cell of the painting. For example, under the limbs of the tree on the right there are patches of color very distinguished against each other, yet they create atmosphere. These are even more separated from the horizontal strokes that form a very light blue patch in the lower right corner, forming the brook. We suddenly realize that he has abstractly compartmentalized every component sub-area, the sum surprisingly resulting in an artful simplicity, a kind of quiet being itself. This is key to the Post-impressionist technique of pictorial structure.

Some of the techniques used in both of these paintings are effective remnants of the Impressionists. But, as evidenced by use of color, structure and a greater need for expression, we can see how the Post Impressionists ideals are creating the unprecedented techniques for future art movements.

The pictorial structure of objects in the "The Brook" was explored further by the Cubists. The compartmentalizing and bringing back together of projected objects on the plane of canvas was something the Cubists explored as a new ideal for seeing things from many perspectives at once.

The Cubists would break objects down to a simpler form by trying to depict it geometrically as the sum of parts. Then they would take these parts and see that object from different points of view and paint it from each of these vantages. This new way of seeing would again revolutionize what we now consider a crucial way to look at art, and therefore the world.

The fragmented geometry of cubism was something that no one had seen before. In "The Coffee Grinder" by Juan Gris we can practically follow the lines of any color expecting a sharp angle, an element of line not yet explored in prior schools of art. These angles act as their own frames for the segmented parts, yet you see every bit of the whole piece necessary to feel the piece integrally as an organic sum of its parts. The most striking example in this piece is the slightly diagonal lines at the lower right and upper left corners. These serve as a natural frame within the piece. The lofty trailing at the top of the grinder is seen under the wooden box and then again to the left and again above the grinder. Every element of the grinder is echoed from all perspectives binding itself by the force and tension of its angles into one cohesive piece.

The structural significance of these elements is an integral part of Cubism. Coming from this depth of perspective, "Guitar and Bottle of Marc on Table" by Georges Braque explores the nature of not just color as a contrasting element, but also texture. The objects are separated and disassembled and analyzed but the flatness of this new tactile quality lends another dimension to the effects of the perspective. Just like in "The Coffee Grinder" colors are used for echoing, repeated, perfectly placed almost like musical cadences, on the canvas plane as segments, geometry and blocks of color.

Along with these ideas of progression in Modern Art, we can experience, visually, the traces of its evolution through form, color and expression (among other elements). Artists use the tools of the past to help express and forcibly push against the limits of what should be considered art, knowing ruefully that it might be to the chagrin and displeasure of the public.

There are many works in this exhibition that I have not covered but are every bit as good as these few examples. We are more than fortunate to have this exhibit on display here in Salt Lake City.

Monet to Picasso from the Cleveland Museum of Art
will be on display at the Utah Museum of Fine Arts through September 21. William Robinson, Curator of Modern European Art at the Cleveland Museum of Art will give a lecture on the exhibit Saturday, August 2, 1-2pm. As per copyright agreements not all works mentioned here include corresponding photographs.


Claude Monet (French, 1840–1926). The Red Kerchief: Portrait of Mrs.Monet (La capeline rouge, portrait de Madame Monet), 1868–78. Oil on fabric; 99 x 79.8 cm. The Cleveland Museum of Art, Bequest of Leonard C. Hanna Jr. 1958.39. © The Cleveland Museum of Art
0 | 1 | 2
Become an Underwriter
Two Sisters Fine Art